3rd Sunday of Lent, Year A – March 8, 2026

 

3rd Sunday of Lent, Year A– March 8, 2026

Exodus 17:3-7; Romans 5:1-2, 5-8; John 4:5-42

 

Theme: The Living Water and The Divine Identity of Jesus

 

A.    Exegetical Analysis of Jn 4:5-42

 

1.      Historical and Literary Contexts

The story of John the Baptist’s final witness about Jesus (3:22-36) precedes and sets the background for our text. Jesus spent time with his disciples, who were baptizing many people in the region of Judea. John the Baptist was also baptizing people in Aenon near Salim. John’s disciples raised a dispute about why many people were going to Jesus’ baptism, administered by Jesus’ disciples, and not by Jesus himself (see 4:1-2). In his answer, John the Baptist testified that Jesus was the Messiah, not him. Due to this dispute, and especially because the Pharisees became aware of how Jesus was making more disciples, Jesus decided to leave Judea and return to Galilee, where he had to pass through Samaria (4:1-4). Our Gospel story picks up from here. It is in the context of Jesus’ self-revelation to the Samaritans. The story of the second sign at Cana (4:43-54) follows our account.

 

2.      Form, Structure, and Movement

Our Gospel passage is a narrative story filled with metaphors. Vv. 5-6 serve as an introduction, while v. 43, which the lectionary has omitted, can be seen as a conclusion. The body of the text (vv. 7-42) contains three movements. The first movement (vv. 7-15) involves a conversation about Living Water. The second movement (vv. 16-26) addresses Jesus’ divine identity. In the third movement (vv. 27-42), the woman and her townspeople recognize Jesus as the Messiah.

 

3.      Detailed Analysis

Vv. 5-6. There was significant conflict between the Jews and Samaritans during both the time before and during Jesus. They share the same patriarch, Jacob, the ancestor of Israel's twelve tribes. After Solomon's death, Israel divided into two kingdoms. Ten tribes of Jacob (Asher, Dan, Ephraim, Gad, Issachar, Manasseh, Naphtali, Reuben, Simeon, and Zebulun) established the independent kingdom of Israel in the north, with Samaria as its capital. The other two tribes (Judah and Benjamin) formed their own kingdom in the south, known as the Kingdom of Judah, with Jerusalem as its capital. The Assyrians conquered the northern kingdom in 722 BC, deporting the Israelites to Assyria and bringing in five foreign nations that intermarried with the Israelites who remained. The descendants of these remaining Israelites and the five foreign nations are identified as Samaritans, who worshipped the gods of those nations. The deported Israelites never returned, and the biblical tradition identifies them as the “lost sheep of Israel.”

The descendants of the Southern kingdom of Judah are known as the Jews. The Babylonians overthrew them in 587/586 B.C. They returned from the Babylonian exile to Jerusalem in the late 500s B.C. Since their return, their relationship with the Samaritans has been poor, as they accused them of losing the right to be “God’s chosen people” due to intermarrying with foreign nations and worshiping pagan gods. Bit by bit, the Samaritans abandoned the worship of foreign gods and returned to worshiping the God of Israel. However, the Jews still prohibited them from worshiping in Jerusalem, which is considered the only legitimate place for worship according to the covenant with David (see the comments of the Samaritan woman in our Gospel passage in v. 20b). In response, the Samaritans, in the fourth century, built their own Temple on Mount Gerizim (that our Gospel refers to in v. 20a) to rival Mount Zion in Jerusalem.

In its spiritual sense, the woman represents all the Samaritans. The five husbands married to the Samaritan woman mentioned in v. 18 of our Gospel passage allude to the five foreign nations that intermarried with the Israelites and the five foreign gods that the people of Israel worshiped.

 Vv. 7-15. Jesus opens the conversation with a simple command: “Give me a drink.” The woman attempts to halt the conversation with a question that carries a hint of mockery (v. 9). She points out to Jesus that the discussion he seeks to start is illogical due to the conflicts between the Jews and Samaritans. Jesus refrains from commenting on their conflict but persists with the topic of water, introducing two shifts. First, he shifts the subject from regular water to “living water.” Second, he alters the roles that he and the woman play in this conversation: Jesus, who initially asked, becomes the giver, while the woman, who was previously the giver, becomes the one who asks. For these two shifts to take effect, the woman must first recognize two facts or truths: (1) The gift of God identified as the living water and (2) the divine identity of Jesus who speaks to her (v. 10). These two facts form the essential foundation for the entire conversation.

The story continues with the theme of living water as God’s gift. The woman questions what Jesus will do to obtain the “supposed living water” from the well since he does not have a bucket and the pool is deep (v. 11). Previously, in v. 9, she referred to Jesus as a “Jew,” but here she calls him “Sir,” which shows a slight improvement in how she relates to Jesus. She compares Jesus to their patriarch, Jacob. This indicates that at this point, she cannot see beyond their tradition, which regards Jacob as the greatest because he provided them with the pool that continues to sustain their lives (v. 12). In his reply, Jesus contrasts the water from Jacob’s well with the living water that he offers, suggesting that he is greater than Jacob. People who drink the water from that well will be thirsty again, but those who drink the living water Jesus provides will never thirst, for it will become a spring of water welling up to eternal life (vv. 13-14). Then, this woman asks Jesus to give her the water he speaks of (v. 15). However, she remains focused on physical water and thirst because, thus far, her faith in Jesus is based on material rather than spiritual needs.

Vv. 16-26. The narrator shifts the topic from the “living water” to “Jesus’ divine identity.” Jesus reveals to this woman her secret about the five “husbands” she had in her life (vv. 16-18). Here, the woman represents all the Samaritans, and the “five husbands” allude to the five foreign gods worshiped by the Samaritans. This indicates that Jesus exposes the unfaithfulness of the Samaritans without judging them because his goal is to call them to repentance and extend God’s salvation to them. Following this revelation, the woman confesses that Jesus is a “prophet.” “Sir, I can see that you are a prophet.” (V. 19). Her faith journey is improving. She moves from referring to Jesus as a “Jew” in v. 9, then as “Sir” in vv. 11 and 15, to calling him a “prophet” here in v. 19.

The Samaritan woman feels guilty because Jesus knows her secret sins. She questions Jesus about the correct place to confess her sins and worship God: The temple on Mount Zion in Jerusalem (for the Jews) or the temple on Mount Gerizim in Samaria (for the Samaritans) (V. 20). Jesus’ answer is a prophecy about extending his Church to all nations when the believers will no longer need to come to these two Mountains to worship God (v. 21). His declaration in v. 22 means that the salvation story continues with the Jews, who are the descendants of the southern kingdom of Judah since the Samaritans mixed their faith in God with other pagan gods and the Israelites from the northern kingdom were deported by the Assyrians and never returned. So, in his answer, Jesus asserts that the salvation that was primarily for the Jews is now extended to all true worshipers, who will worship the Father in Spirit and truth. God seeks such worshipers, and he came to seek the Samaritans to become part of these worshipers (vv. 23-24). The expression in Spirit and truth is “not a reference to an interior worship within one’s own spirit. The Spirit is the spirit given by God that reveals truth and enables one to worship God appropriately (Jn 14:16-17. Cf. ‘born of water and Spirit’ (Jn 3:5).”[1]

The woman’s reply in v. 25 connects Jesus’ explanation about the correct place to worship God to what the Samaritans believe about the forthcoming Messiah: They believe that it is the Messiah who, when he comes, will answer this question to end the dispute between them and the Jews (v. 25). Here, it is Jesus who answers this question and resolves their quarrel with the Jews. Jesus confirms to her that “I am he,” meaning, I am the Messiah you are waiting for (v. 26). The expression “I am he,” which can also be translated as “I AM,” is the expression that the Old Testament used to refer to Yahweh (see Is 43:3). So, here, Jesus is asserting that he is both the Messiah and God.

Vv. 27-42. The journey of faith for this woman comes to its fullness: Jesus is no longer “a Jew” (see v.9), or “a Sir” (see vv. 11, 15), or “a Prophet” (see v. 19), but now the Messiah. This faith transforms her into a missionary. She leaves her water jar and goes to share her experience with the townspeople. Leaving her water jar symbolizes abandoning everything in favor of prioritizing the proclamation of the Gospel. The townspeople believe in Jesus thanks to the mission work of this woman (vv. 29-30, 39). However, they deepen their faith when they have their own experience with Jesus (see vv. 40-42). Vv. 31-38 captures Jesus’ conversation with his disciples. He tells them that the mission to do his Father’s will is his primary “food.” In their absence, he fulfilled this mission; he extended salvation to the Samaritans through this woman.

 

4.      Synthesis

The Jews did not consider the Samaritans to be the chosen people, yet Jesus extended salvation to them through a woman he met at Jacob’s well (vv. 5-6). The conversation unfolded in three stages and developed two essential topics: The Living Water as the Gift of God and (2) the revelation of Jesus’ divine identity. The first stage (vv. 7-15) focused on the Living Water as the Gift of God. Here, Jesus led this woman to believe that he is the Living Water, which, upon drinking it, becomes a spring of water welling up to eternal life. In the second stage (vv. 16-26), Jesus systematically helped this woman discover his divine identity. In the third stage (vv. 27-42), the woman became a missionary who spread news of Jesus to her townspeople. The Samaritans first believed in Jesus because of her missionary work, and later, they deepened their faith, no longer based on her words but on their own experience with Jesus.

 

B.     Pastoral Implications

 

1.      The Liturgical Context

The Gospel texts selected for the remainder of Lent serve as a form of sacramental catechesis, as catechumens begin intensive preparation for initiation into the sacraments. The liturgy of this Third Sunday of Lent invites us to meditate on the themes of the “Living Water” and the “Divine Identity of Jesus.” In the Gospel, Jesus affirms his divine identity to a Samaritan woman. Just as God provided drinking water to the thirsty Israelites in our first reading, Jesus is the source of Living Water for all who believe in him (Gospel). In the second reading, Saint Paul reminds us that Jesus, the Messiah, died for us and justified us. He then calls us to embrace the justification Jesus offers us through our faith in him, hope in eternal salvation, and love for God and our brothers and sisters.

 

2.      What the Church Teaches Us Today

Today, Jesus meets each of us as he met the Samaritan woman in our Gospel. The well symbolizes the baptistery and font where the catechumens will be baptized, and all of us, the baptized, will renew our baptismal promises at this coming Easter vigil. Our encounter with Jesus in the baptismal font of our Church will signify the moment of the full light of our faith in Christ.

In vv. 7-15, Jesus opens the conversation by asking for water because he is thirsty. In a spiritual sense, Jesus thirsts not for water but for extending salvation (the gift of God) and revealing his divine identity to the Samaritans. Jesus continues to feel “thirsty” even today. Jesus’ thirst is the Church’s thirst and our thirst. As Jesus’ followers, our mission is to extend God’s salvation to our brothers and sisters, including those we consider enemies, and help them believe in Jesus as the Messiah, who came to lead us to the full light of our faith in God through the water of baptism. In our Gospel, the woman tries to stop this conversation, reminding Jesus of the conflict between the Samaritans (represented by the woman) and the Jews (represented by Jesus). People may also prevent us from evangelizing them. Like Jesus, let us not give up because their salvation matters.

Then, the Samaritan woman compares Jesus to their patriarch, Jacob. At this point, she cannot go beyond their tradition, which considers Jacob the greatest because he gave them this pool, which continues to save their lives (v. 12). Like this woman, we sometimes allow our human traditions and convictions to prevent us from believing in Jesus. Our relationship with Jesus should be based not on material but on spiritual needs. For instance, we attend Mass, serve our Church in different ministries, and help people in our community not because we want Jesus to pay us back, but out of gratitude for his love.

In vv. 16-26, the narrator shifts the topic from the “living water” to “Jesus’ divine identity.” Through the woman in our Gospel, Jesus reveals how the Samaritans are unfaithful to God without passing judgment, as his goal is to call them to repentance and extend God’s salvation to them.  Jesus continues to unveil the secrets of our hearts to each of us. He knows us better than we know ourselves. He highlights our infidelity without judging us because his mission is to prompt us to repent and embrace the salvation he offers. In our second reading, Saint Paul tells us that Jesus died for us and justified us. Then, Saint Paul invites us to claim this justification through our faith in Jesus, hope in eternal salvation, and love for God and our brothers and sisters. We can achieve this only by regularly attending Mass and worshiping our God in “spirit and truth” in our local Churches, as Jesus prophesies to the woman in our Gospel (see v. 21). 

In vv. 27-42, the narrator reveals how this woman's faith journey reaches its fullness. She believes Jesus to be the Messiah and becomes his missionary, abandoning everything to prioritize the proclamation of the Gospel to her townspeople. Once our faith reaches its fullness at the end of this Lenten journey, the catechumens will receive the sacraments of initiation, and all of us, the baptized, will renew our baptismal promises during this Easter Vigil. Then, like the woman in our Gospel, we will become missionaries who prioritize proclaiming the Word of God to our brothers and sisters, inviting them to come to Jesus and experience him for themselves. The Samaritan people in our Gospel first believed in Jesus through the woman’s missionary work, and later, they deepened their faith through their own experience with Jesus. This signifies that we build our faith on what others (priests, parents, schoolteachers, catechists, etc.) tell us about Jesus and what we learn during this Lenten season. We should not stop there. After the sacraments of initiation (for the catechumens) and the renewal of the baptismal promises (for the baptized) during the Easter Vigil, we will be called to deepen our faith by starting our own one-on-one relationship with Jesus.

May this Eucharistic celebration enable us to experience Jesus, mature our faith in him, and become his missionaries wherever we live. Amen.  

Rev. Leon Ngandu, SVD

Pastor of Holy Family Catholic Church, Jackson, MS &

SVD USS Biblical Apostolate Coordinator

 



[1] NABRE, note to Jn 4:23.

2nd Sunday of Lent. March 1, 2026

 

2nd Sunday of Lent. March 1, 2026

Genesis 12:1-4a; 2 Timothy 1:8b-10; Matthew 17:1-9

 

Theme: The Lenten Season is a Journey of Faith 


A. A Brief Exegetical Analysis of Matthew 17:1-9

 

1.      Historical and Literary Contexts

Before our Gospel story, Jesus predicted his Passion, Death, and Resurrection to his disciples for the first time. Peter objected to this announcement on behalf of all the disciples, refusing to let Jesus undergo his Passion and Death (16:21-23). In response to their objection, Jesus taught them the conditions of discipleship, which include denying oneself, taking up one’s cross, and following Jesus (16:24-28). These two teachings of Jesus disturbed the disciples, and they were on the verge of quitting their discipleship. Then, in our Gospel, Jesus uses the scene of his Transfiguration to strengthen his disciples’ hope and trust in him as they are about to begin the journey toward Jerusalem, where his prediction of his Passion, Death, and Resurrection will be fulfilled. Our Gospel passage is immediately followed by an explanation of the coming of Elijah (17:10-13) and the healing of a boy with a demon (17:14-21).     

 

2.      Form, Structure, and Movement

Our Gospel text is a narrative with metaphors. V. 1 serves as an introduction, and v. 9 as a conclusion. The body of the text (vv. 2-8) unfolds in two movements. The first movement (vv. 2-3) describes Jesus’ transfiguration and includes Moses and Elijah in the scene. The second movement (vv. 4-8) recounts the disciples' experiences of the events surrounding Jesus's transfiguration. 

 

3.      Detailed Analysis

V. 1. The Bible does not explain why Jesus chose Peter, John, and James as his inner circle. He made them witnesses to special events, including the “raising” of Jairus’ daughter (Lk 8:49-56), the Transfiguration, and his prayer in Gethsemane (Mt 26:36-38). The mountain: Although the Synoptics do not name this mountain, Tradition identifies it with either Tabor or Hermon. By not specifying a particular mountain, the Synoptics likely focus on its theological meaning rather than its geography. If so, this mountain in the Transfiguration story recalls Moses on Mount Sinai (Ex 24:12-18) and Elijah on Horeb (1 Kgs 19:8-18). Horeb is another name for Sinai. In the biblical context, a mountain typically signifies a place of prayer and an encounter with God.

  V. 2-3. Moses and Elijah joined Jesus in this glorious moment and conversed with him. Matthew does not reveal the topic of their conversation. Readers learn the topic from Luke’s account. For Luke, Jesus, Moses, and Elijah were conversing about Jesus’ exodus that he would accomplish in Jerusalem (Lk 9:31). 

Vv. 4-8. Peter’s request to make three tents, one for Jesus, one for Moses, and one for Elijah, reflects their eagerness to remain in that glorious state forever. God intervenes in this scene through the “bright cloud” that casts a shadow over them. In the Old Testament, the cloud signified God’s presence among his people (see Ex 40:34-35; 1 Kgs 8:10). In this Gospel, the “bright cloud” represents God’s presence. The shadow signifies that God’s presence enveloped these disciples, enabling them to experience the mystery of Jesus’ glorification.

All three Synoptics mention the three disciples’ fear, with little difference. For Mark, they were terrified before the cloud cast a shadow over them, linking their fear to Jesus’ Transfiguration and the appearance of Moses and Elijah. According to Luke, they became frightened once the cloud cast a shadow over them. Matthew, however, connects their fear to the voice from the cloud and its message.

From the cloud, God’s voice says: “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him.” “Listen to him” is an order addressed to all disciples, through Peter, John, and James, to dispel the doubts, shocks, and discouragements that had arisen in them because of Jesus’ earlier announcement of his Passion. God orders them to listen to Jesus when he reveals that he is not the “army-conquering Messiah,” as they expect him to be, but the suffering Messiah. The three disciples fell prostrate when they heard God’s message.

V. 9. Jesus forbids these three disciples from telling anyone about the Transfiguration until his Passion, death, and Resurrection are accomplished, because people will understand it only in the light of his Resurrection. 

 

4.      Synthesis

All the disciples were disappointed, shocked, and ready to abandon their discipleship when they heard Jesus predict his Passion for the first time and explain that self-denial and accepting one’s cross are the conditions for being his disciples. Jesus drew on the experience of his Transfiguration to strengthen their hope and trust in him and to encourage them not to give up their discipleship, since the glory of the Transfiguration they had experienced awaits those who follow him to the end. These three disciples heard God’s voice confirming that Jesus was his beloved Son, with whom God is well pleased. God’s voice also commanded them to listen to Jesus.


 B.  Pastoral Implications 

1. Liturgical Context

The Scripture readings for this Second Sunday of our forty-day penitential journey remind us that the Lenten season is our “Journey of Faith” toward Easter, and that our earthly lives are also a Journey of Faith toward God’s kingdom in heaven. The Transfiguration of Jesus, which we heard in our Gospel, marks the beginning of Jesus’ Journey of Faith toward Jerusalem, where the Paschal Mystery (Jesus’ Passion, Death, Resurrection, and Ascension) will unfold. Our first reading recounts the beginning of Abraham’s Journey of Faith toward the promised land. The second reading speaks of the crosses we encounter in our Journey of Faith, which we should not avoid but carry with courage, standing firm in the Lord and putting our faith in him.

 

2. What the Church Teaches Us Today

Matthew begins his Gospel by teaching us that Jesus selects you and me for his inner circle. He leads us to our “mountain,” our local Churches and families, where we encounter God in prayer. Peter’s request to make three tents, one for Jesus, one for Moses, and one for Elijah, shows how eager they are to remain in that glorious state forever. I found two interpretations of why Peter made this request: (1) Through his request, Peter wants to enjoy Jesus’ glorification without passing through his Passion and Death. Many of us sometimes act like Peter here. We enjoy celebrating Easter but do not like Lent because we do not want to engage in the works of repentance: prayer, fasting, and almsgiving, which prepare and lead us to Easter. There is no Easter without Good Friday. There is no glory in God’s kingdom without accepting to die with Christ through our resolution to repent every time we sin.

(2) By asking to build three tents, Peter expressed his desire to remain in this heavenly glory forever rather than return to their ordinary lives. We experience the glory of the Transfiguration at every Mass we attend. However, we cannot “build three tents in our Churches” and stay here forever, enjoying the heavenly glory alone while many people are still in the darkness of this world. Instead, Jesus expects us to go out at the end of each Mass to share our experience of the Transfiguration with our brothers and sisters so that they, too, may follow Jesus and come to have the same experience.

Matthew reports that the presence of God, through the cloud, casts a shadow over these three disciples and us. Then God’s voice tells us that Jesus is his beloved Son, with whom he is well pleased. He finally commands us to listen to him. God continues to cast a shadow over us, especially in the Eucharistic celebration, and tells us that Jesus is his Son, inviting us to listen to him. We are called to listen to Jesus, especially when he tells us that he is not a suffering Messiah, so we should follow in his footsteps. Listening to Jesus involves observing the Lenten works of penance (Prayer, Fasting, and Almsgiving) and faithfully following God’s commandments and the Church’s teachings, even when they challenge us.

At the end of the scene, the disciples find Jesus alone, without Moses and Elijah. The Transfiguration is over. Jesus is alone now. It is time to come down from the mountain and accompany him on his “journey of faith” toward Jerusalem. Our first reading tells us the story of Abraham’s “journey of faith.” God called him to leave his land and go to an unknown land that God himself would show him. God promised to make Abraham’s descendants a great nation (Gn 12:1-3). We, too, are on our “Lenten Journey of Faith” toward Easter, which prefigures our “Journey of Faith” toward our heavenly home. As we continue our “journey of faith,” Saint Paul, in our second reading, advises us to bear our share of hardship for the Gospel with the strength that comes from God (2 Tim 1:8b).  

  Jesus forbids these three disciples from telling anyone about the Transfiguration until his Passion, death, and Resurrection are accomplished, because the Transfiguration will be understood only in the light of his Resurrection. Let us strengthen our relationship with Jesus during this Lenten “Journey of Faith” so that we might share our own experience of Jesus’ Resurrection with our brothers and sisters at Easter.

May the liturgy of this Mass enable us to become men and women of prayer, listening to the Beloved Son of God. Thus, at the end of our Lenten “Journey of Faith,” we can celebrate the Resurrection of our Lord well, and at the end of our daily “Journey of Faith,” we will inherit the promised land in God’s kingdom. Amen.

 

Fr. Leon Ngandu, SVD

Pastor of Holy Family Catholic Church in Jackson, MS &

SVD USS Biblical Apostolate Coordinator

1st Sunday of Lent – Feb. 22, 2026

 

1st Sunday of Lent – Feb. 22, 2026

Genesis 2:7-9; 3:1-7; Romans 5:12-19; Matthew 4:1-11

 

Theme: We Are Called to Overcome the Lust of the Flesh, the Lust of Glory, and the Lust of the Eyes Each Day


A. A Brief Exegetical Analysis of Matthew 4:1-11

 

1.      Historical and Literary Contexts

Matthew places our Gospel text immediately after the story of Jesus' baptism (3:13-17) and before the beginning of Jesus’ ministry in Galilee (4:12-25). With the story of Jesus’ baptism, Matthew prepares his readers to understand that Jesus, who is about to begin the ministry of building the kingdom of heaven, is equipped by the Holy Spirit and is the Son of God. Moreover, his baptism was not for repentance (since he is sinless) but to empathize with humanity. Now, the evangelist uses our Gospel passage to inform his audience that Jesus’s victory over Satan signifies that the kingdom of heaven he is about to establish involves restoring the relationship between God and his people, which Adam and Eve lost through their disobedience to God when they were tempted by the same Satan.

  

2.      Form, Structure, and Movement

Our Gospel text is a narrative in dialogue form. Vv. 1-2 serve as an introduction, and v. 11 as a conclusion. The body of the text (vv. 3-10) is divided into three movements based on the three temptations: the turning of the stone into bread (vv. 3-4), the throwing down from the parapet of the temple (vv. 5-7), and the temptation to worship the devil in exchange for the earthly kingdoms (vv. 8-10).

 

3.      Detailed Analysis

Vv. 1-2. “The Spirit led Jesus into the desert to be tempted by the devil” (Mt 4:1). Temptation is not merely a circumstance but the purpose of Jesus’ sojourn in the desert. This Spirit is the same who descended upon Jesus during his baptism (see Mt 3:16). In his baptism, Jesus was declared “Son of God.” The hallmark of true sonship is obedience to the Father. Now, his obedience to God the Father is put to the test. Jesus fasted for forty days and forty nights. The number “forty” primarily recalls the forty years of the people of Israel’s long journey from Egypt to the promised land, during which God tested them (see Dt 8:2). Here, Matthew depicts Jesus as a new Israel and shows that, unlike the old Israel, which disobeyed God on several occasions and failed to prove its sonship, Jesus, the new Israel, overcame all tests and remained obedient to God the Father. This number “forty” also refers to the forty days and forty nights Moses spent on Sinai in a meeting with God to receive God’s commandments, symbolizing their covenant with God (see Exodus 24:18). Here, Matthew presents Jesus as a new Moses. He spends forty days and forty nights in prayer with God before he begins his public ministry of inviting people to a new covenant through him. [Jesus] was hungry: In its literal sense, this shows Jesus’ human nature; in its spiritual sense, it means Jesus was hungry for the beginning of the kingdom of heaven on earth, which will end the devil’s reign.

The devil employs a series of three temptations. In Matthew, the sequence is: first, the desert; then, Jerusalem; and finally, the world's kingdoms. Luke places Jerusalem at the end to show that it is where Jesus’ ministry will culminate and where he will face his greatest temptation and triumph (see Lk 22:39-46; 23:44-49; 24).[1] The devil knows very well that Jesus is the Son of God and that Jesus’s mission to build the kingdom of heaven will challenge the devil’s reign and cause him to lose members under his control. The devil also knows that the key to stopping Jesus from fulfilling this mission is to push him to disobey God. This is the goal he pursues through all three of his temptations. He already employed this strategy with Adam and Eve, successfully pushing them to disobey God (see Gen 3:1-7). 

 The three temptations of the devil correspond to the three lusts of human beings. The first, turning the stones into bread, represents the lust of the flesh. The second, performing a spectacle by throwing himself from the parapet of the temple, is the lust for glory. The third, the world’s kingdoms, stands for the lust of the eyes, the desire for power and possessions.

  Vv. 3-4: The devil begins his series of temptations with the lust of the flesh. He urges Jesus to use his divinity to turn a stone into bread to satisfy his human hunger. There are two traps here. First, the tempter aims to push Jesus to focus on his physical hunger and forget his “spiritual hunger," which is establishing God’s kingdom. Second, he seeks to remove Jesus from the most basic human experience, thereby weakening him in fulfilling his mission. The devil used this temptation before with Adam and Eve and succeeded (see Gn 3:1-7), but here, with Jesus, he failed. Quoting Scripture (Dt 8:3), Jesus answered, “One does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes forth from the mouth of God” (V. 4). While the devil wants Jesus to concentrate on his physical hunger, which only bread can satisfy, Jesus focuses instead on the spiritual hunger, which only the Word of God can fulfill. He also refuses to use his divinity to avoid human suffering. 

Vv. 5-7. After failing in the first temptation, the devil employs a second strategy: the lust of glory or worldly recognition. He urges Jesus to throw himself down from the Temple’s parapet as a spectacle to prove that he is the Son of God. Citing Ps 91:11-12, he reassures him that God will command his angels to protect him. The trap is to push Jesus to focus on earthly glory and forget his mission to build the kingdom of heaven. With this strategy, the devil had already succeeded in separating Eve and Adam from their God. He deceived them into believing that if they ate the fruit of the tree, their eyes would be opened and they would be “like God” (Gn 3:5, NRSVCE). Adam and Eve ate the fruit because they wanted the divine glory: to be equal to God. In our Gospel, Jesus’ response to the devil, “You shall not put the Lord, your God, to the test” (v. 7), is a quote from Dt 6:16. Jesus affirms that he is God. The expression “your God” (v. 7) means he is the God of the entire universe, including the devil.

Vv. 8-10.  The third temptation concerns the lust of the eyes, or avarice, the desire for possessions. He took Jesus up to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in their magnificence (or riches). He promised to give them all to Jesus on one condition: that Jesus prostrate himself and worship him. He used this tactic with Adam and Eve and succeeded in deceiving them. Unlike Eve, who saw that the tree pleased her eyes (Gn 3:6), Jesus does not let the lust of the eyes prevent him from fulfilling his mission. Quoting Dt 6:13, he tells the devil that God is the only one people should worship and serve (v. 10). 

V. 11. The devil used all three temptations he prepared to push Jesus to disobey God, attempting to make Jesus abandon his mission of building the kingdom of heaven on earth, but ultimately, he failed. The narrator notes that he left Jesus, and the angels came to minister to him.

 

4.      Synthesis

Jesus is the new Israel. Unlike the Old Israel, which repeatedly disobeyed God, Jesus, the New Israel, overcame all temptations and remained obedient to God. Jesus is also the new Moses. The Old Moses spent forty days and forty nights on the mountain with God, where he received God’s commandments, symbolizing the covenant between God and the Israelites. Similarly, Jesus spent forty days and forty nights in the desert with God before beginning his public mission to call the people to a new and final covenant with God through him. Jesus is also the new Adam. The first Adam succumbed to the devil's temptations and disobeyed God. As a result, sin entered the world and brought condemnation. Jesus, the new Adam, resisted all the devil's temptations and continued to obey God. Consequently, he restored the relationship between humanity and God and brought salvation.    

 

B. Pastoral Implications

 1. Liturgical Context

The Scripture readings today told us, on the one hand, that our first ancestors (Adam and Eve) failed to resist the devil's temptation. Consequently, sin entered the world and brought condemnation (the first and second readings). On the other hand, we heard how Jesus overcame the devil’s temptations. As a result, he restored our original alliance with God and brought us salvation (the Gospel and the second reading).

 

2.      2. What the Church Teaches Us Today

The Church wants us to know that, as Baptized, we continue Jesus’s mission to build God’s kingdom wherever we live. This mission entails ministering to the people of God and, thus, delivering them from the power of the devil. Recognizing that our mission threatens to lose the souls under his control, the devil continues to tempt us, as he did with Jesus, using the same strategies: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the lust for glory. This threefold lust is known as threefold concupiscence. All sins we commit fall into these three categories. The devil’s goal is to push us to disobey God and abandon our crucial mission. To overcome these temptations, the Church calls us to observe the three Lenten disciplines: Fasting for the lust of the flesh, Prayer for the lust for glory, and Almsgiving for the lust of the eyes.

First, the devil employs the lust of the flesh, or bodily appetite. By urging Jesus to use his divine power to turn a stone into bread to satisfy his hunger, the devil set two traps. (1) He wanted Jesus to prioritize his physical hunger over his spiritual hunger. (2) He sought to remove Jesus from the most basic human experience, thereby weakening him in fulfilling his mission. He employed these two traps with Adam and Eve before and succeeded (see Gn 3:1-7), but with Jesus he failed. How about us today? Satan pushes us to prioritize our physical hunger over our spiritual hunger. Although our physical bodies need food to survive, let us remember that our souls also need spiritual food. To resist this temptation, the Church encourages us to observe the first Lenten discipline: Fasting. When we fast, we respond to the devil by quoting Jesus, “One does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes forth from the mouth of God” (Mt 4:4). Fasting also helps us recognize that the way our physical bodies grow weak and need food immediately is the same way our souls experience and need spiritual food. Let us observe fasting during this Lent and make it a habit in our Christian lives.

Second, the devil employs the lust for glory or worldly recognition. By inciting Jesus to throw himself down from the Temple’s parapet as a spectacle to prove he is the Son of God, the devil’s trap is to shift Jesus’ focus to earthly glory, thereby causing him to forget his mission. He succeeded with Adam and Eve, using this trap. He deceived them into believing that if they ate the fruit of the tree, their eyes would be opened and they would be “like God” (Gn 3:5, NRSVCE). Adam and Eve ate the fruit because they wanted the divine glory: to be equal to God. How about us today? Whenever we seek public recognition while neglecting our primary mission of ministering to the people of God, we fail like Adam and Eve. Here, the Church exhorts us to observe the Lenten discipline of Prayer to resist this temptation. Prayer is an act of humility, recognizing that we are nothing without God. When we pray to God, we confess that he is the Creator and that we are his creatures; therefore, we do not seek to equal him.

Third, the devil uses the lust of the eyes, which is avarice or the desire for possession. He displayed all the kingdoms of the world in their magnificence before Jesus and promised to give them all to him on one condition: Jesus must worship him. Note that he had already succeeded in trapping Adam and Eve with this temptation. Unlike Eve, who saw that the tree pleased her eyes (Gn 3:6), Jesus does not let the lust of the eyes turn him away from his mission. Quoting Dt 6:13, he tells the devil that God is the only one people should worship and serve (v. 10). How about us today? Satan continues to display the magnificence of our world, with all its technologies, before our eyes. His trap is to make us focus on possessing them and to forget our dependence on God. To resist this temptation, our Holy Mother Church urges us to observe the Lenten discipline of almsgiving regularly. When we share what we have with others, we respond to the devil by showing that we do not depend on material possessions but on God alone.

In the liturgy of this Mass, we ask for God’s grace so that we continue to detach ourselves from the lust of the flesh, the lust of glory, and the lust of the eyes. We want to focus on our baptismal mission to save people from the devil’s grasp. Amen.

Rev. Leon Ngandu, SVD

Pastor of Holy Family Church in Jackson, MS &

SVD USS Biblical Apostolate Coordinator

 



[1] Michael F. Patella, The Gospel According to Luke, (Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 2005), 28.

6th Sunday in Ordinary Time A – Feb. 15, 2026

 

6th Sunday in Ordinary Time A – Feb. 15, 2026

Sirach 15:15–20; 1 Corinthians 2:6-10; Matthew 5:17–37

 

Theme: God Gives License to Sin to No One

 

A.   A Brief Exegetical Analysis of Matthew 5:17-37

 

  1. Historical and Literary Contexts

Our Gospel passage comes from the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew’s Gospel (Mt 5-7). Before this section, Matthew recounts the beginning of Jesus’ public ministry in Galilee (4:12-25), where Jesus exhorts the people to repent before becoming members of the kingdom of heaven he has just begun (see 4:17). Immediately after this episode, Matthew presents a series of Jesus’ teachings called the “Sermon on the Mount” (Mt 5-7), in which Jesus teaches the crowds and his four new disciples the lifestyle of the heavenly kingdom. Our passage covers five of these teachings: the law, anger, adultery, divorce, and oaths. In each teaching, Jesus declares the former understanding of the Law inadequate and offers a new, authentic interpretation that highlights an aspect of good relationships among people. The teaching about the similes of salt and light (5:13-16) immediately precedes our text, and the teaching about retaliation (5:38-42) comes after. 

 

  1. Form, Structure, and Movement

Our text is a collection of teachings presented through metaphors. Jesus employs antithetical statements: “You have heard that it was said … but I say to you …” The text is organized into five topics: the teaching about the law (5:17-20) comes first, followed by anger (vv. 21-26), adultery (vv. 27-30), divorce (vv. 31-32), and oaths (vv. 33-37).

 

  1. Detailed Analysis

Vv. 17-20. The teaching about the law. Jesus begins by letting his listeners know that he has not come to abolish the law or the prophets but to fulfill them (v. 17). The Torah (the books of law) and Nevi’im (Prophetic books) are two significant parts, along with the third part, Ketuvim (other scriptures), that compose the Hebrew Bible called Tanakh (an acronym of Torah, Nevi’im, and Ketuvim). Here, Jesus is saying that his mission is not to replace or break what the books of Law and the Prophetic books say but to bring new and authentic interpretations.

There are two interpretations of the expression “to fulfill.” (1) Jesus means bringing the law to its intended purpose, or (2) he himself fulfills the law through his total conformity to God’s will.[1] The expression “until heaven and earth pass away” (v. 18) does not necessarily refer to the end of the universe. Instead, it points to Jesus’s death and resurrection, which mark the turning of the ages from the old to the new. Isaiah prophesied this time as “new heavens and a new earth” (Is 65:17; 66:22). When Matthew wrote this Gospel, believers were already living in this new and final age. Meanwhile, Jesus’ ministry, as he recounts it here, remains within the framework of the law while anticipating the age to come.[2] So, Jesus’ statement in v. 18 means that he promises to fulfill the law during his earthly ministry before his death and resurrection. In vv. 19-20, he clarifies who can be members of the kingdom of heaven and who cannot. Followers must obey Jesus’ commandments and teach them to others; their righteousness must also surpass that of the scribes and Pharisees to be members of the kingdom of heaven. Otherwise, they do not qualify. 

In the following four teachings (vv. 21-26, 27-30, 31-32, and 33-37), Jesus addresses six examples of the conduct that those who want to be members of the kingdom of heaven must follow. Three of them accept the Mosaic law but deepen it (5:21-22, 27-28, 43-44), while the other three reject the laws of Moses as a standard of conduct for the disciples (5:31-32, 33-37, 38-39).[3] Jesus introduces each of these four teachings with this antithetical statement or its equivalent: “You have heard that it was said to your ancestors… But I say to you…”

Vv. 21-26: The teaching on anger. This is not righteous anger, that is, outrage at injustice that fuels work toward change. Instead, it is an anger that can lead to killing. Moses’ law prohibited killing (Ex 20:13; 21:12; Dt 5:17). In his interpretation of this law, Jesus focuses on anger, the interior disposition of “killing.” He gives three concrete examples of how to resolve anger.

(1) The disciples must avoid getting angry with their brothers (and sisters), saying to them “Raqa,” and calling them “fools” (V. 22). Matthew describes an ascending order of punishment: from the local judgment for the one who gets angry, to appearing before the Sanhedrin for those who call others “Raqa,” and to punishment in “fiery Gehenna” for those who call their brothers “fools”.[4] This ascending order is a way of speaking about the judgment before God. Raqa is an Aramaic word, rēqā’ or rēqâ, meaning “empty-headed.” Gehenna, in Hebrew gê-hinnōm (“valley of Hinnom”) or gê ben-hinnōm (“Valley of the son of Hinnom”), was the center of an idolatrous cult in the southwest of Jerusalem during the monarchy, where children were offered in sacrifice (see 2 Kgs 23:10; Jer 7:31). Translated from Hebrew into Greek, the word Gehenna (or Geenna) in the New Testament refers to the place of punishment for sinners by fire.[5] “Sanhedrin” was the Supreme Jewish Council composed of High Priests, Elders, and Scribes. It controlled civil and religious law.

(2) The disciples should prioritize reconciling with someone who has a grievance against them rather than bringing their gifts to the altar (vv. 23-24). Offering gifts to God does not cover over or repair broken relationships.[6] The priority is to seek reconciliation first, then offer the gifts to God.

(3). To resolve anger, Jesus exhorts those who want to be members of the kingdom of heaven to settle quickly with their opponent and avoid letting conflicts escalate into lawsuits in court (vv. 25-26). Thus, Jesus' new interpretation of the Law, “You shall not kill,” calls the disciples to avoid anger and pursue reconciliation, because broken relationships fuel anger that can lead to murder.

Vv. 27-30: The teaching on adultery. The Mosaic law prohibited adultery (Exodus 20:14; Dt 5:18). Just as “anger” was the interior disposition of “killing,” so here Jesus calls his disciples to avoid the lustful look because it is the prelude to adultery (vv. 27-28). To underscore the seriousness of the sin of lust, Jesus uses the metaphor of tearing out one’s eye and cutting off one’s hand. For Jesus, it is better to lose one of the members than to commit the sin of lust and be thrown, with the whole body, into the furnace of hell, “Gehenna” (vv. 29-31).

Vv. 31-32: The teaching about divorce. Jesus considers the union of a couple previously divorced from their valid marriages a form of adultery. Moses commanded that when a man is displeased with his wife and wants to divorce her, he should write a bill of divorce, give it to her, and dismiss her from his house (see Dt 24:1-5). In Jewish custom, only males could initiate divorce. In his interpretation of this law, Jesus adds the clause, “unless the marriage is unlawful,” which denies the possibility of divorce. On different occasions, Jesus strongly prohibited divorce (see Mk 10:11-12; Lk 16:18; cf. 1 Cor 7:10, 11b). For Jesus, the only reason that can cause divorce is the unlawfulness of marriage, which refers to marriage between close relatives (blood relatives) (see Lv 18:6-18). These sorts of marriages were considered incest.[7] Jesus states that a man who divorces his wife causes her to commit adultery because she remains bound to him in marriage. Likewise, whoever marries a divorced woman (or a divorced man) commits adultery. While Mosaic Law addressed the right thing to do (writing a bill of divorce) after one has divorced one’s wife, Jesus’ new interpretation of this law invites the disciples to reflect on the permanence of marriage and the sin that divorce entails.

Vv. 33-37: The teaching about oaths. In the Old Testament, taking oaths was permitted. People associated God (or things related to God, such as heaven, earth, Jerusalem, or God’s power, as in swearing by one’s head) with their oaths to guarantee truthfulness. In this practice, many abused God’s name by taking false oaths. That is why Moses’ law prohibited taking oaths falsely, not taking oaths at all (see Exodus 20:7; Dt 5:11; Lv 19:12). Here, Jesus rejects even the command to swear: “But I say to you, do not swear at all.” (Mt 5:34). Jesus’ interpretation of this law focuses on the interior disposition of the oath, which is a lack of transparency. The members of the kingdom of heaven must eradicate lies in relationships to end the need to take oaths. “Let your ‘Yes’ mean ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No’ mean ‘No’. Anything more is from the evil one.” (V. 37). There is no need to swear where there is transparency and truth.  

 

4.      4. Synthesis

Jesus does not intend to abolish the Mosaic law but to fulfill it. He promises that this fulfillment will ultimately occur before his death and resurrection. To be part of the heavenly kingdom, people must obey him, teach his commandments to others, and have righteousness that surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees. Furthermore, the citizens of the kingdom of heaven must avoid anger, the inner disposition that leads to murder, and prioritize reconciliation. They must avoid the lustful look, which is the prelude to adultery. They should not divorce, except in cases of unlawful marriages, because it leads spouses to commit adultery. Finally, they should eliminate lies in relationships to remove the need for swearing.         

 

B.    Pastoral Implications

 

1.      Liturgical Context

After this Sunday, we will temporarily pause Ordinary Time, as we begin the Lenten Season this Wednesday with the Ash Wednesday Mass. We will resume Ordinary Time after Pentecost Sunday. Today’s Gospel passage continues Jesus’ teachings from the Sermon on the Mount, which we began reading before last Sunday. On that Sunday, we read the first part, in which Jesus taught us the Beatitudes as a way of life in the kingdom of heaven. Last Sunday, we explored the second teaching, in which Jesus told us that we are the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Today, through five additional teachings, Jesus presents a new way to observe the commandments and avoid sin. The sacred author of our first reading tells us that we are responsible for our salvation or condemnation based on the choices we make through our free will. He states that God has not given anyone permission to sin. While the teachings of our Gospel and first reading can be challenging to observe, Saint Paul, in our second reading, reassures us that we have God’s Spirit.

 

2.      What the Church Teaches Us Today

The first teaching of our Gospel (vv. 17-20) exhorts us to observe God’s commandments and teach them to others; our righteousness must surpass that of the scribes and Pharisees to enter the kingdom of heaven. In the second teaching (vv. 21-26), the Church calls us to avoid anger and seek reconciliation, because broken relationships fuel anger that can escalate to murder. The third teaching (vv. 27-30) calls all of us to avoid the lustful look, which is the prelude to adultery. In the fourth teaching (vv. 31-32), Jesus considers divorce a form of adultery. While Mosaic Law addressed the right thing to do by requiring a bill of divorce once one has divorced his wife, Jesus’ new interpretation of this law invites us to reflect on the permanence of marriage and the sin of divorce. When we understand that lawful marriage is for life, we will avoid divorce, and then there will not be adultery. The fifth teaching (vv. 33-37) exhorts us to eradicate lies in our relationships to end the need for taking oaths. “Let your ‘Yes’ mean ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No’ mean ‘No’. Anything more is from the evil one” (v. 37). There is no need to swear where there is transparency and truth. The Church exhorts us to observe all of Jesus’ new interpretations of Mosaic law to be counted among the members of the kingdom of heaven.

Our first reading passage reminds us that we are responsible for our salvation or condemnation through the choices we make with our free will. To be members of the kingdom of heaven, we must keep God’s commandments and Jesus’ teachings in our Gospel. Choosing the opposite leads to death. The author of our first reading makes clear that there is no excuse for failing to keep God’s commandments, stating, “He has not commanded anyone to be wicked, and he has not given anyone permission to sin” (v. 20, NRSVCE).

When Ben Sirach wrote this book, some believed their status exempted them from following God’s instructions like everyone else. Thus, there was a tendency to excuse the sins of high-ranking people (kings, princes, bishops). Likewise, today many of us mistakenly believe that our difficult circumstances, such as illness, stress, poverty, and suffering, exempt us from keeping God’s commandments and justify our sins. Sin may seem to ease our suffering, but in reality it does not. It can be likened to a childhood rash. It is difficult for a child to resist scratching, yet the more he scratches, the more the rash spreads and worsens. Similarly, when we experience suffering, the Church encourages us not to sin, as sin exacerbates our situation. A sin remains a sin regardless of whether it is committed to relieve suffering. Sin does not bring happiness; instead, it “spreads the rash," damaging our souls and harming our relationships with God and our fellow humans. Therefore, neither “high-ranking individuals” nor “those suffering greatly” are excused from doing what is right. God “has not given anyone permission to sin,” says Sirach (Sir 15:20).

In our second reading, Saint Paul reassures us that we, as Christians, embody the Spirit of Jesus. In the liturgy of this Mass, let us pray that the Spirit, who scrutinizes everything, even the depths of God, might enable us to be good citizens of the kingdom of heaven. Amen.

Rev. Leon Ngandu, SVD

Pastor of Holy Family Church in Jackson, MS &

SVD USS Biblical Apostolate Coordinator      

 

 



[1] Ian Boxall, “Matthew” in The Jerome Biblical Commentary for the Twenty-First Century, 1182.

[2] See NABRE, note to Matthew 5:17-20.

[3] NABRE, note to Matthew 5:21-48.

[4] Ian Boxall, “Matthew” in The Jerome Biblical Commentary for the Twenty-First Century, 1183.

[5] NABRE, note to Matthew 5:22.

[6] Barbara E. Reid, The Gospel According to Matthew, 37.

[7] NABRE, note to Mt 5:31-32.

3rd Sunday of Lent, Year A – March 8, 2026

  3rd Sunday of Lent, Year A– March 8, 2026 Exodus 17:3-7; Romans 5:1-2, 5-8; John 4:5-42   Theme: The Living Water and The Divine Ide...