3rd Sunday of Easter, Year A – April 19, 2026

 

3rd Sunday of Easter, Year A – April 19, 2026

Acts 2:14, 22-33; 1 Peter 1:17-21; Luke 24:13-35

 

Theme: The Risen Lord is the Motivation of our Christian Faith

 

A.   A Brief Exegetical Analysis of Lk 24:13-35

 

  1. Historical and Literary Contexts

The story of Jesus’ appearance on the road to Emmaus is unique to Luke. It is the second of the five stories in Luke’s resurrection narrative section (24:1-53). It is preceded by the account of the women at the empty tomb (24:1-12) and followed by Jesus’ appearance to the disciples in Jerusalem (24:36-43), Jesus’ final instructions (24:44-49), and the Ascension (24:50-53). Luke places all of Jesus’ appearances in and around Jerusalem and describes them as having occurred on Easter Sunday. In our passage, as in this entire section of the resurrection narrative, Luke aims to inform his readers that Jesus’ Passion, Death, and Resurrection fulfilled Old Testament promises and Jewish hopes.[1]

 

  1. Form, Structure, and Movement

Luke narrates this story in both catechetical and liturgical forms. Vv. 13-16 can be viewed as an introduction, while vv. 33-35 serve as a conclusion. The body of the text can be structured into two movements based on the two topics developed in this passage: The interpretation of the Scriptures (vv. 17-27) and the breaking of the bread (vv. 28-32).

 

  1. Detailed Analysis

Vv. 13-16. Emmaus is likely the hometown of these two disciples. They lived in Jerusalem because they followed Jesus. Now that Jesus is dead, everything seems finished; there is no longer any motivation or reason for them to stay in Jerusalem. Disappointed, sad, and confused, they are on their way back to Emmaus to resume their former lives. Jesus appears to them, but they do not recognize him. One of these disciples, Cleopas, is not well known among Jesus’ disciples. Some Bible scholars suggest that he might be the same person as Klopas mentioned in John’s Gospel, whose wife, Mary, stood by the cross of Jesus (see Jn 19:25) because these two names, Cleopas and Klopas, are similar. If this is the case, then the unnamed second disciple of Emmaus could be his wife, Mary. The exact location of Emmaus, seven miles (sixty stadia) from Jerusalem, is disputed. Some biblical scholars believe that this Emmaus could be the traditional site at “Amwas” on the Jerusalem-Jaffa road or the village of el-Qubeibeh. However, the former place is twenty miles away, and the latter is eight miles from Jerusalem, not seven miles, as Luke mentions.[2]

Vv. 17-27. These two disciples discuss Jesus’ Passion and Death. Jesus joins their conversation with a question: “What are you discussing as you walk along?” His question seems bizarre to them because everyone in Jerusalem knows what happened to Jesus. They tell him the whole story, revealing their disbelief in Jesus’ Resurrection. Jesus interprets the Scriptures that refer to him and helps them understand that his Suffering, Death, and Resurrection fulfilled Old Testament promises (vv. 25-27).

Vv. 28-32. The Scriptures that Jesus shared effectively prompted them to invite him to stay with them that night. The Breaking of the Bread is the second step in Jesus' plan to help these disciples believe in his Resurrection. Jesus’ actions over the bread, “he took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them,” are similar to the actions he employed over the bread in the Last Supper (see Lk 22:19). This signifies that Jesus shares the Eucharistic Bread with these two disciples. Through these two methods, the Interpretation of the Scriptures and the Breaking of the Bread, these two disciples recognize Jesus and believe in his Resurrection.

Vv. 33-35. These two disciples were heading to Emmaus to return to their former lives because they were disappointed by the death of their Master, Jesus. Now, believing that Jesus is alive, their motivation for discipleship is reactivated. Consequently, they return to Jerusalem to continue their discipleship.

 

  1. Synthesis

These two disciples were on the road, returning to their home village of Emmaus to resume their former lives because Jesus, whom they had followed in Jerusalem, had died, and there was no longer motivation to stay there. Jesus appeared to them, but they did not recognize him. He employed two methods to open their spiritual eyes and help them believe in his Resurrection. In the first method, Jesus interpreted the Scriptures that referred to him, teaching them that his Suffering, Death, and Resurrection fulfilled Old Testament promises. In the second method, Jesus shared with them the Eucharistic Bread, “his Body.” These two methods enabled the disciples to recognize him and believe in his Resurrection. As a result of their belief, they decided to return to Jerusalem and continue their discipleship.

 

B.    Pastoral Implications

  1. Liturgical Context

What should motivate our discipleship? Some believers' motivations for being active Christians come from their loved ones, their ministries in the Church, or certain circumstances. Once they lose these motivations, they leave the Church or stop praying to God. Today’s Bible readings teach us that Jesus’ Resurrection should motivate and inspire our discipleship, just as it did for the disciples of Emmaus after they recognized Jesus (Gospel) and for Peter in our first and second readings.

 

  1. What the Church Teaches Us Today

In the Gospel, the disappointed disciples of Emmaus were on the road returning to their village when Jesus appeared to them. Leaving Jerusalem indicates they have abandoned discipleship, as they believe Jesus, their motivation, is no longer alive and that everything seems finished. Returning to Emmaus signifies a return to their former lives. Many Christians act like these two disciples when facing suffering. We abandon our Christian faith and revert to our previous lives without Jesus. Our Holy Mother Church encourages us to recognize the presence of Jesus, who always wants to join us in our daily struggles, just as he did with these two disciples.

The two methods Jesus employed with these two disciples, which enabled them to recognize him and believe in his Resurrection, constitute the two parts of our liturgy of the Mass. In the first method, Jesus interpreted the Scriptures for these disciples, helping them realize that his Suffering, Death, and Resurrection fulfill Old Testament promises. Peter also used this method in our first reading. He referred to David in the Old Testament and quoted him when he called his audience to believe in Jesus’ Resurrection. Likewise, at each Mass we attend, we first listen to Jesus, who, through the lay and ordained ministers, reads and interprets the Word of God for us. In the second method, Jesus shared the Eucharistic Bread with these disciples. He does the same with us in the second part of the Mass. He shares with us his Body and Blood in Holy Communion. These two parts of the Mass, the celebration of the Word of God and the celebration of the Eucharist, open our spiritual eyes and enable us to believe that our Lord is alive.

As a result of their belief, these two disciples returned to Jerusalem and continued their discipleship. The Church calls us to do the same. Each Mass we attend transforms us and makes us pursue our discipleship with courage and faith, conducting ourselves with reverence during our earthly sojourning, as Peter exhorts us in our second reading (see 1 Pt 1:17).  Amen.

 

Rev. Leon Ngandu, SVD

Pastor of Holy Family Catholic Church in Jackson, MS &

SVD-USS Biblical Apostolate Coordinator

 

 



[1] NABRE, note to Lk 24:1-53.

[2] Carroll Stuhlmueller, “The Gospel According to Luke” in The Jerome Biblical Commentary, edited by Raymon E. brown, Joseph A. Fitzmyer and Roland E. Murphy (Englewood Cliffs, New Jessey: Prentice-Hall), 163. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Easter Sunday of the Resurrection of the Lord, Year A - April 5, 2026

  Easter Sunday of the Resurrection of the Lord, Year A - April 5, 2026 Acts 10:34a, 37-43; Colossians 3:1-4; John 20:1-9   Theme: The...