29th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year A - October 18, 2026

 

29th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year A - October 18, 2026

Isaiah 45:1, 4-6; 1 Thessalonians 1:1-5b; Matthew 22:15-21

 

Theme: Political and Spiritual Needs Should Not Be in Contradiction with Each Other

A.    A Brief Exegetical Analysis of Matthew 22:15-21

 

  1. Historical and Literary Contexts

The three parables in a row (21:28-32; 21:33-46; 22:1-14) that Jesus told the Jewish religious leaders in response to their lack of faith in him infuriated them. They now saw Jesus as a threat to their power. Moving forward, Matthew presents a series of three entrapping questions directed at Jesus, through which they conspired to either publicly humiliate him before the Jewish community or gather legal evidence to accuse him, ultimately seeking to have him arrested and condemned by the Roman authorities. Our Gospel passage discusses the first of these three entrapping questions, which is immediately preceded by the parable of the Wedding Feast (22:1-14) and followed by the second tricking question about the Resurrection (22:23-33).   

 

  1. Form, Structure, and Movement

V. 15 introduces this Gospel narrative, while v. 22, omitted from our passage by the lectionary, concludes it. The text is structured in two movements: the first presents the question posed to Jesus by the Pharisees’ disciples and the Herodians (vv. 16-17), and the second examines Jesus’ response (vv. 18-21).

 

  1. Detailed Analysis

V. 15. This verse is connected to three consecutive parables (21:28-32; 21:33-46; 22:1-14) that Jesus told the Jewish religious leaders in response to their lack of faith in him. The lessons from these parables angered them. In response, they now plot against Jesus, seeing him as a threat to their power.

Vv. 16-17. At the time of Jesus, Israel was under Roman occupation. The Herodians were Israelites who supported Herod, the Roman puppet king, and worked for the Romans. The Pharisees were professional religious scholars who sought to impose their interpretation of the Mosaic laws on everyone.[1] The Herodians, a political group, and the Pharisees, a religious group, did not get along for several reasons, including their differing views on paying the census tax to Caesar; the Herodians favored it, while the Pharisees opposed it. In this passage, they form an unholy alliance solely because Jesus is their common enemy.

Their question to Jesus, whether it is lawful to pay the census tax to Caesar, presents both a political and a religious dilemma. The “lawful” here refers to the divine law. Since this is a yes-or-no question, if Jesus says, “Yes, it is lawful," the Pharisees can accuse him to the Jewish community of supporting the Roman regime. On the other hand, if Jesus says, “No, it is not lawful," the Herodians will use it as legal evidence to report him to the Roman authority and have him arrested and condemned.

Vv. 18-21. To understand Jesus’ response, it is essential to recognize that under the Pax Romana (Roman Peace), the Roman government allowed Jewish religious groups in Jerusalem to levy a tax on all expatriate Jews throughout the Roman Empire to support the Temple. However, the Jewish religious leaders were illegally enriching themselves from this tax.[2] Thus, in the first part of his response, “Repay to Caesar what belongs to Caesar,” Jesus highlights the hypocrisy of these dishonest Jewish religious leaders, challenging them to abandon the tax they imposed on expatriate Jews before they concern themselves with the tax the Roman government imposes on them.

In the second part of his response, “Repay to God what belongs to God,” Jesus elevates the debate to a higher level. Since the coin bears Caesar’s image, they should give him the currency that belongs to him. Likewise, God’s image and likeness are stamped on each person, as stated in Genesis 1:26a, 27a: “Then God said: Let us make human beings in our image, after our likeness… God created mankind in his own image; in the image of God he created them” (NABRE). This means that human beings belong to God. Therefore, as much as they are concerned with paying taxes to Caesar, the Pharisees and Herodians should also be concerned with giving themselves to God by embracing the kingdom of heaven that Jesus established on earth.

V. 22. The narrator’s comments in this verse, omitted by the lectionary from our Gospel passage, suggest that the Pharisees and Herodians failed in their attempt to entrap Jesus.

  

  1. Synthesis

The Pharisees and Herodians, who typically do not get along, form an unholy alliance to entrap Jesus, their common enemy. They pose a yes-or-no question to Jesus about whether paying the census tax to Caesar is lawful under God’s law. If Jesus says, “Yes, it is lawful,” the Pharisees will discredit him among the Jewish community, accusing him of supporting the Romans who occupied Israel at that time. If he says, “No, it is not lawful,” the Herodians will report him to the Roman authorities, who will arrest and condemn him for inciting people to disobey Roman laws.

In his response, Jesus first challenges all the Jewish religious leaders to abandon the practice of illegally enriching themselves from the taxes they impose on their fellow Israelites before they can be concerned about paying taxes to Caesar. Second, since Caesar’s image is printed on the coin, indicating that the currency belongs to him, Jesus tells them to give to Caesar what belongs to him. Likewise, since God created human beings in his image and likeness, meaning that God’s image and likeness are stamped in human beings, the Pharisees and Herodians should be concerned about giving themselves to God because they belong to God. This means that instead of seeking to condemn Jesus, they should believe in him and embrace the kingdom of heaven he established on earth.

 

B.     Pastoral Implications

 

  1. Liturgical Context

In our Gospel, the Pharisees and Herodians try to entrap Jesus with a political and religious question. In his response, Jesus shows that political and spiritual needs should not contradict each other. For instance, our first reading tells us that God used King Cyrus, a political leader, to bless his chosen people. In all that we do (in politics and religion), the Church calls us to imitate the Thessalonian believers by keeping our work of faith, labor of love, and endurance in hope of our Lord Jesus, as we heard in our second reading.

 

  1. What the Church Teaches Us Today

(1) While the Jewish religious leaders ironically appeared to oppose the census tax to Caesar, they were illegally enriching themselves from the tax the Roman government allowed them to impose on their fellow expatriate Jews living in the Roman Empire to support the Temple. In the first part of his response, “Repay to Caesar what belongs to Caesar,” Jesus challenges them and all of us to be honest with ourselves and to prioritize our relationship with God before worrying about the wrongdoings of others. Many Christians today involve themselves in fighting for political causes, even good ones, but neglect their spiritual lives. Any good cause we fight for loses its significance if we neglect our relationship with God, which is the primary need of our lives. As we continue to fight for justice and peace and promote the well-being of people in our societies, let us remember that we must also fight to bring people and ourselves closer to God for the well-being of our souls in the heavenly kingdom.

 (2) Using the example of Caesar’s image on Roman currency, Jesus reminds the Jewish religious leaders and all of us that God’s image and likeness are stamped on our souls. We are created in God’s image and likeness (Gn 1:26-27). Therefore, in the second part of his response, “Repay to God what belongs to God,” Jesus means that the Jews and all of us should render to the political authorities what pertains to politics, while at the same time rendering to God “ourselves” because we belong to him. This is what the Jewish religious leaders and many of us fail to do. Like these Pharisees and Herodians, many Christians today focus more on maintaining their social and political power than on embracing the kingdom of heaven that Jesus came to establish.

In this Gospel, Jesus teaches us that political and spiritual needs should not contradict each other. This is what we heard in our first reading. God used King Cyrus, a political leader, to bless his people, the Israelites. In all that we do, our Holy Mother Church calls us to imitate the Thessalonian believers by keeping our work of faith, labor of love, and endurance in hope of our Lord Jesus, as we heard in our second reading. Amen. 

Rev. Leon Ngandu, SVD

Pastor of Holy Family Catholic Church in Jackson, MS &

SVD-USS Biblical Apostolate Coordinator

 



[1] John Bergsma, “The Word of the Lord: Reflections on the Sunday Mass Readings for Year A,” 443.

[2] John Bergsma, “The Word of the Lord: Reflections on the Sunday Mass Readings for Year A,” 444.

No comments:

Post a Comment

29th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year A - October 18, 2026

  29 th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year A - October 18, 2026 Isaiah 45:1, 4-6; 1 Thessalonians 1:1-5b; Matthew 22:15-21   Theme: Politi...